Not Logged In     Login  
 Release 21.0, Jan 2008
 
Chapter : ch9. Dentistry & Oral Medicine Section : Indices for Evaluating Dental Health Status
  The Columbia Gingival Index (GI) for Gingivitis

  Excel Sheet Reference
Copyright (c) 2006-2007, Institute for Algorithmic Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. All rights reserved.

Overview :

Chilton et al evaluated the Columbia Gingival Index (GI) to evaluate patients with gingivitis. This can help diagnose patients with gingivitis and monitor the response to interventions. The authors are from Columbia University in New York City.

 

The evaluation can be performed on:

(1) a subset of 6 teeth (referred to as the "Ramfjord teeth" since they were used by Ramfjord; these same teeth are used by several of the preceding indices)

(2) all of the teeth in the mouth

 

The authors demonstrated that the findings from testing 6 teeth was comparable to that of the whole mouth. Testing the subset is usually preferred since it is easier and faster to complete.

 

Designated Tooth (US Classification)

Location of the "Ramfjord" Teeth

3

right maxillary first molar

9

left maxillary medial incisor

12

left maxillary first premolar (bicuspid)

19

left mandibular first molar

25

right mandibular medial incisor

28

right mandibular first premolar (bicuspid)

 

6 sites on each tooth is scored (the same sites are used in other indices above):

(1) mesiobuccal

(2) buccal

(3) distobuccal

(4) mesiolingual

(5) lingual

(6) distolingual

 

Each site is scored based on the gross evidence of gingivitis.

 

Color

Appearance

Points

pink

firm, knifelike gingival margin; interdental papilla triangular

0

no or slight color change

gingival margin slightly swollen and no longer knifelike and firm

1

discreet areas of redness along the most coronal surfaces of the free gingival margin

 

2

obviously red

no bleeding on gentle finger pressure

3

obviously red

bleeds on gentle finger pressure

4

 

The authors did not describe how the final index was derived. Based on other indices (above) and the fact that scores on patients ranged from 4 to 12 (Figure 1, page 40), the following scheme seems likely. I favor this scheme since it would be the only way that a full mouth score would give similar results.

 

index for each tooth =

= SUM(points for all 6 scoring points)

 

partial mouth score =

= AVERAGE(indices for all 6 teeth)

 

Interpretation:

• minimum partial mouth score: 0

• maximum partial mouth score: 24

• The higher the score, the greater the severity of gingivitis.

 

  References:

Chilton NW, Fertig JW, Talbott K. Partial and full mouth recording of gingivitis scores. Pharmacology and Therapeutics in Dentistry. 1978; 3: 39-44.

 

 

   Excel Sheet | Reference TOP
     Pubmed Search For
Copy and paste the article title, or authors names into the search box